I love this kind of fantasy topic, and really like how the film version came out. But still, the timing for a film to tell a complete story is difficult. I believe that Steven Spielberg did film most of the story, but he cut out some parts just for matching the time limit. Film version compare to the novel one feel like it lost some build up, and also the relationship between characters.
In novel version, Author build up the background of Wade, so we can connected with him and understand him more. And also set up the environment issues for the future deeply in the novel one. For me, to have a connection with main character is important, so this is the big miss for me. I want to feel what character's feel, but the film kind of missed it. The biggest difference for me about a film which adapted from a novel is always missing the build up parts. Ready Player One is a good movie for entertaining, but that big missing parts is what I would do.
Film version change lots of the challenge parts, I know it is a difference choice. But I do like the build up of the first mission from the novel, it's more challenge and solving problem instead of just a action racing. Maybe for the timing, it's necessary to simplify. But feel like it not as strong as novel one.
2018年3月1日 星期四
訂閱:
張貼留言 (Atom)
14_ Suddenly, a Knock on the Door
1. The story is so weird for me, I tried to get the point of this story but not really. I read it for few times and can't feel what'...
-
The first title of Pride and Prejudice was "First Impression." It fit in the content of the story more for me personally. But...
-
Wes Anderson, as known as a famous American film director, also famous on how him directed films in his symmetry style. I watch The Fant...
-
I love this kind of fantasy topic, and really like how the film version came out. But still, the timing for a film to tell a complete st...
沒有留言:
張貼留言